|
(1) Carlsen,Magnus (2772) - Leko,Peter (2762) [C45]
Nanjing Pearl Spring 2nd Nanjing (1), 28.09.2009
[Stohl]
1.e4
e5
2.Sf3
Sc6
3.d4
Earlier Carlsen only very rarely essayed the Scotch, the inspiration for his choice was very clear. To quote the winner verbatim: "This game was provided by Garry Kasparov..." 3...exd4
4.Sxd4
Lc5
One of the two main moves. [The line 4...Sf6
5.Sxc6
bxc6
6.e5
De7
7.De2
Sd5
8.c4
also occurred in Nanjing. More usual is 8...La6
(8...Sb6
9.Sc3
De6
10.De4
La6
(10...d5
11.exd6
cxd6
12.Ld3
Dxe4+
13.Lxe4
Lb7
14.b3 [Weiß steht etwas besser]
[Endspiel]) 11.b3
Lb4
12.Ld2
Lxc3
13.Lxc3
d5
14.Dh4
dxc4
15.Le2
Sd5
16.Lxc4
g5
17.Dd4
Lxc4
18.Dxc4
0-0-0
19.0-0
Sf4
20.Da6+!?N
As the resulting [Endspiel] is pleasant for Black and doesn't pose him any problems, White wants to profit from the [schwacher Punkt] [Damenflügel] in the middle-game. (20.Dxe6+
Sxe6=
(20...fxe6!?=
) ) 20...Kb8
21.Tfe1
Dg4
22.Df1
Td3
23.Tac1
Thd8
24.f3
De6
25.Te4
h5
26.Tb4+
(26.Le1!?
) 26...Ka8
27.Tc4
Camacho,G (2355)-Valdes,L (2392)/Pinar del Rio/2006/ 27...h4 [unklar]
[Gegenspiel]) 9.Sd2
(The most common continuation is 9.b3
) 9...0-0-0
(9...Sb4
10.Sf3
c5
11.a3
Sc6
12.Ld2
De6
13.Lc3
Le7
14.0-0-0
f6
15.exf6
Dxe2
16.f7+
Kxf7
17.Lxe2
Tad8
18.Ld3
Lf6
19.Kc2
Lb7
20.Lxf6
Kxf6
21.Kc3
Se7
22.b4
Lxf3
23.gxf3
cxb4+
24.axb4
d5 [Gegenspiel]
Svidler,P (2585)-Yemelin,V (2515)/St Petersburg/1995/) 10.b3
f6
(10...g5?!
11.Lb2
Lg7
12.0-0-0
Sb6N
This novelty doesn't represent a substantial improvement, Black was still fighting for his life after (12...Sf4
13.De3
Kb8
14.h4
h6
15.g3
Se6
16.Se4
g4?!
(16...c5 [Weiß steht etwas besser]
) 17.c5!
Lxf1
18.Thxf1
h5
19.Kb1
The8
20.f4
gxf3
21.Txf3 [mit Initiative]
Abdulyazanov,M (2361)-Belousov,A (2226)/Uljanovsk/2008/) 13.h4
g4
14.f4!?
gxf3
15.Sxf3
c5
16.De1
Lb7
17.Ld3
h6
18.Dg3
Tdg8
19.The1
d5
20.exd6
Lxb2+
21.Kxb2
Dxd6
22.Lf5+
Kb8
23.Te8+
Sc8
24.Txd6
Txg3
25.Txh8
cxd6
26.Se1
Kc7
27.Th7 [Weiß steht besser]
Radjabov,T (2757)-Topalov,V (2813)/Nanjing/2009/) 11.Lb2
fxe5
12.0-0-0
Sf6
(12...Te8 [unklar]
) 13.Dxe5
Dxe5
14.Lxe5
Sg4
15.Ld4
c5
16.Le2
cxd4
17.Lxg4
Lb7
18.Lf3
Te8
19.Lxb7+
Kxb7
20.Sf3
c5
21.The1 [Weiß steht etwas besser]
Sulskis,S (2555)-Hernandez Carmenates,H (2473)/Yucatan/2004/; Steinitz's 4...Dh4
is considered extremely risky nowadays, Black suffers for the § after 5.Sc3
Lb4
6.Le2!
Lxc3+
(6...Sf6
7.0-0
Lxc3
8.Sf5!
(8.bxc3
Sxd4
9.cxd4
Sxe4 [unklar]
) 8...Dxe4
9.Ld3
Dg4
10.f3
Da4
11.bxc3 [Entwicklungsvorsprung]
[mit Angriff] 11...Kf8
(11...0-0?!
12.Sxg7!
[mit der Idee] 12...Kxg7?
13.Lh6+!+-
) 12.De1
Se8
13.Dg3
d6
14.Sxg7!
Tg8
15.Lh6
Txg7
16.Tae1
Se5
17.f4
Sxd3
18.cxd3
Lf5
19.h3!
(19.Txe8+
Kxe8
20.Dxg7
Lxd3
21.Df8+
Kd7
22.Dxa8
Lxf1
23.Kxf1
Dd1+
24.Kf2
Dc2+
25.Kg3
Dg6+
26.Lg5
h6
27.Dxb7
hxg5
28.Db5+
c6
29.f5! [Weiß steht etwas besser]
/ [Weiß steht besser] However, White doesn't have to force the issue.) 19...Db5
Kasimdzhanov,R (2614)-Vladimirov,E (2586)/Namangan/2000/ 20.Tf3!
Dc5+
21.d4
Dd5
22.Dg5
Le4
23.f5!+-
; 6...Dxe4
7.Sdb5
Lxc3+
8.bxc3
-6...¥c3) 7.bxc3
Dxe4
8.Sb5
Kd8
9.0-0
Sf6
10.Le3
Te8
11.Te1
d6
12.Tb1
Ld7
13.c4
Se5?!
(13...Sg4!? [Gegenspiel]
) 14.c5
Lc6
15.Lf1
Dg6
16.Sd4
Ld5
17.Lf4
Sfd7
18.Lg3
dxc5
19.Sb5
Le4
20.Dd2 [mit Angriff]
Vescovi,G (2646)-Rodriguez Vila,A (2479)/Sao Paulo/2005/; 4...Lb4+
was featured in a survey by Postny in CBM 130.] 5.Le3
The more ambitious choice. [While he still played, Kasparov was the one to dictate the trends in the Scotch. More than a decade ago he concentrated mostly on 5.Sxc6
Df6
Currently more fashionable is 6.Df3
, but this is hardly too dangerous: (and now 6.Dd2
dxc6
7.Sc3
However, Black can allow even further disruption of his § structure and get sufficient piece [Gegenspiel] after 7...Se7
(Postny advocates 7...Ld4
in CBM 103.) 8.Df4
Sg6
9.Dxf6
gxf6
10.Ld2
Tg8
11.Sa4
Ld6
12.0-0-0
Le6
13.Sc3
0-0-0
14.g3
Lg4
15.Le2
Se5
16.Lf4
Lh3
17.Lh5
Lc5
18.Txd8+
Txd8
19.Sd1
Lg2
20.Te1
Sf3
21.Te2
Sg1
22.Lg4+
Kb8
23.Td2
Txd2
24.Kxd2
Lxe4
25.Sc3
Lg2
26.Le3
Le7
27.Lh5
Sf3+
28.Ke2
Sg1+
1/2, Kasparov,G (2785)-Topalov,V (2750)/Las Palmas/1996/) 6...bxc6
(6...Dxf3
7.gxf3
bxc6
8.Le3
Lxe3
9.fxe3
Se7 [Gegenspiel]
=) 7.Sd2
(7.Dg3
h5
8.h4
Sh6
9.f3
d5
10.Sc3
Ld4!
11.Ld2
Tb8
12.0-0-0
Le5
13.Dg5
(13.f4
Ld4
14.Dd3
Lg4
15.e5
Lxc3
16.Dxc3
De6
17.Te1
0-0
18.Le3
Tfd8
19.Dc5
a5!
20.Kb1
a4
21.Ld3
Lf5=
/ [Schwarz steht etwas besser] 22.Tc1?
Lxd3
23.cxd3
Sf5
24.Lf2
Tb5
25.Dxc6
Tdb8-+
Rublevsky,S (2680)-Grischuk,A (2717)/Elista cm/2007/) 13...Dd6
14.exd5
0-0
15.Lc4
cxd5
16.Lxd5
Dxd5!
17.Sxd5
Lxb2+
18.Kb1
Lc3+
19.Kc1
Lb2+
20.Kb1
Lc3+
1/2, Rublevsky,S (2680)-Grischuk,A (2717)/Elista cm/2007/; 7.Sc3
d6
8.Dg3
Dg6
9.Ld3
Sf6
10.Sa4
Ld4
11.c3
Lb6
12.f3
Sd7
13.Lf4
f6
14.Lc4
Se5
15.Dxg6+=
1/2, Radjabov,T (2761)-Aronian,L (2750)/Wijk aan Zee/2009/) 7...d6
8.Sb3
Lb6
9.a4
a5
10.Ld2
Dxf3
11.gxf3
Se7
12.Tg1
0-0
13.Le3
Lxe3
14.fxe3
c5
15.0-0-0
Le6
16.Sd2
f5
17.e5
(17.f4
Tf6
[mit der Idee] ¦h6 [Gegenspiel] Postny) 17...Tfd8
18.exd6
cxd6
19.Lc4
d5
20.Lb5
Sg6
21.Tg5
Se5
22.Tdg1
g6
23.h4
Kg7=
Nataf,I (2533)-Stefansson,H (2563)/Reykjavik/2009/] 5...Df6
6.c3
[The right way to deal with 6.Sb5?!
is 6...Lxe3
7.fxe3
Dh4+
8.g3
Dd8
9.Dg4
g6
10.Df4
d6
11.Lc4
Se5
12.0-0
Lh3! [Schwarz steht besser]
, as explained by Postny in CBM 113.] 6...Sge7
7.Lc4
Once again this is currently the only move, which causes Black any problems: [After Morelia 2007 due to Ivanchul-Leko some interest focused on 7.g3
d5
8.Lg2
dxe4
9.0-0
0-0
10.Sd2
Lb6
11.Te1
(11.Sxe4
Dg6
12.Sc5
is mentioned by Lukacs and Hazai in their article in CBM 114. Black equalizes after 12...Sxd4
13.Lxd4
(13.cxd4
c6
14.Te1
Sd5
15.Lxd5!?
cxd5
16.Db3
Sutovsky,E (2679)-Harikrishna,P (2609)/Pune/2004/ 16...Le6=
) 13...Sc6
14.Te1
Sxd4
15.Dxd4
c6
16.a4
a5
17.De5
(17.Te7
Dg5
18.Te5
Df6
19.Tae1
1/2, Predojevic,B (2509)-Gustafsson,J (2603)/Mallorca olm/2004/) 17...h6
18.Tad1
Lg4
19.Td2
Lxc5
20.Dxc5
Tfe8
21.Txe8+
Txe8
22.h3
Df5
23.Dxf5
Lxf5
24.b4
axb4=
1/2, Smeets,J (2538)-Kramnik,V (2766)/NED-chT/2007/) 11...Td8!?N
is a clever and seemingly effective novelty. (11...Sxd4
12.Sxe4
Dg6
13.Lxd4
Sc6
14.Lxb6
axb6
15.Dd2
Df5?!
16.h3
h6
17.g4
Db5
18.a4!
Txa4
19.Sf6+
gxf6
20.Txa4
Dxa4
21.Dxh6 [mit Angriff]
Ivanchuk,V (2750)-Leko,P (2749)/Morelia/Linares/2007/) 12.Sxe4
Dg6
13.De2
Lg4
14.f3
Ld7
15.Tad1
Sf5
16.Sxc6
(16.Sxf5=
) 16...Lxc6
17.Lxb6
axb6
18.Txd8+
Txd8=
/ [Schwarz steht etwas besser] , Rublevsky,S (2676)-Hammer,J (2402)/ECC Kemer/2007/; 7.Le2
d5!
8.0-0
0-0
9.Sxc6
Dxc6
10.Lxc5
Dxc5
11.Sd2
Td8
(11...Le6=
is symmetrical and very boring.) ; Morozevich used to experiment a bit with 7.Sc2
, but here Black has a wide choice. Probably the simplest is 7...Lxe3
(7...Lb6
; 7...d6!?
; or even 7...b6!?
are playable alternatives: 8.Sd2
Dg6
9.Lxc5
bxc5
10.Se3
Tb8
11.b3
0-0
12.Lc4
d6=
13.f4?
Df6
14.0-0
Dxc3
15.Tf3
Dd4
16.Kh1
Le6
17.Tc1
Lxc4
18.Txc4
Db2
19.Tc2
Df6 [Schwarz steht besser]
Blackburne,J-Lasker,E/St Petersburg/1914/) 8.Sxe3
De5
9.Sd2
d5
10.Ld3
dxe4
11.Lxe4
Le6
12.Da4
0-0-0
13.Sf3
Da5
14.Dxa5
Sxa5
15.Sg5
Td6
16.0-0
Sc4
17.Tfe1
Sxe3
18.Txe3
h6
19.Sxe6
Txe6
20.Td1
c6
21.Kf1
1/2, Morozevich,A (2774)-Aronian,L (2763)/Yerevan rpd/2008/] 7...Se5
8.Le2
[Less testing is 8.Lb3
Dg6
9.0-0
d5!
(9...Dxe4
10.Te1
Dg6
11.Sb5 [mit Initiative]
) 10.Lf4
Lg4!
(10...Dxe4
11.Dd2 [Kompensation]
Marin) 11.Dc2
f6
12.La4+
c6
13.Sd2
0-0
14.f3
Ld7
15.Kh1
Lb6
16.Tae1
Tae8
17.Te2
Kh8
18.Lg3
Dh5
19.Dd1
Lc7
20.Tfe1
Lb8=
Morozevich,A (2758)-Leko,P (2751)/WCh Mexico City/2007/] 8...Dg6
The main move seems good enough for the time being. [However, Black has a plausible alternative in 8...d5
9.0-0
(9.f4
Sg4
10.Lxg4
Dh4+
11.g3
Dxg4
12.Dxg4
Lxg4
13.e5
0-0
14.Sf5
Lxe3
15.Sxe3
Lf3
16.Tf1
Le4
17.Sd2
Ld3
18.Tf2
c5
19.Sf3
f6 [Gegenspiel]
Chigorin,M-Schiffers,E/St Petersburg/1879/) 9...0-0
(9...dxe4?
10.Sb5
Ld6
(10...Lb6
11.Lxb6
Dxb6
12.Dd4!+-
) 11.Lc5! [Weiß steht besser]
) 10.f4
(10.Sd2
Lb6
11.f4
Dh6!=
) 10...S5c6
(10...Dh6
11.Dd2! [mit Initiative]
) 11.e5
Dh4
(11...Dg6?!
12.f5
Lxd4
13.fxg6
Lxe3+
14.Kh1
hxg6
15.Lg4 [Weiß steht besser]
) 12.Dd2
(12.g3
Dh3 [Gegenspiel]
; 12.Lf2!?
Lxd4
13.Lxd4=
/ [Weiß steht etwas besser] gives White perhaps more chances to fight for an edge.) 12...Lg4
13.Ld3
f6!?
(13...a6?!
14.Sxc6
Lxe3+
15.Dxe3
Sxc6
16.Sd2
De7
17.Tae1
Tae8
18.Sb3
f6
19.Dg3
f5
20.Df2
Lh5
21.Sc5
Tb8
22.b4 [Weiß steht besser]
Rublevsky,S (2645)-Popov,V (2568)/EU-ch Warsaw/2005/) 14.Sxc6
Lxe3+
15.Dxe3
Sxc6
16.h3
Lc8 [Gegenspiel]
Postny] 9.0-0
d6
This is the safest reaction: [9...Dxe4?!
is playing with fire after 10.Sd2
(10.Sb5
Lxe3
11.Sxc7+
Kd8
12.Sxa8
Lf4
[mit der Idee] 13.g3
Lc1! [unklar]
) 10...Dg6
11.Lh5
Dd3
12.S4f3!? [Entwicklungsvorsprung]
[mit Angriff]; Better, but still risky is 9...d5
10.Lh5!?
Dxe4
(10...Lg4
11.Lxg6
Lxd1
12.Lxf7+
Kxf7
13.Txd1
Sc4
14.b4
Lb6
15.Sd2
Sxe3
16.fxe3
The8
17.c4
dxc4
18.Sxc4 [Weiß steht besser]
Rublevsky,S (2645)-Gretarsson,H (2465)/Yerevan ol/1996/) 11.Sd2
(11.Sb5!? [Kompensation]
) 11...Dd3
(11...Dh4
12.Lxf7+!
Sxf7
13.S4f3
Df6
14.Lxc5 [mit Initiative]
) 12.S4f3
Ld6
(12...Lxe3!?
13.Sxe5
Dxd2
14.Df3
0-0
15.Lxf7+
Kh8
16.Dxe3
Dxe3
17.fxe3 [Entwicklungsvorsprung]
[Weiß steht etwas besser] [Endspiel]) 13.Sxe5
Lxe5
14.Lc5
g6
15.Le2
Df5
16.Sf3
Lf6
17.Te1
0-0
18.Ld3
Dd7
19.Se5
Dd8
20.Df3
Kg7
21.h4!
Lxh4
(21...h5?
22.Sd7!
Lxd7
23.Dxf6+!
) 22.Df4
Lf6
23.Sf3!
[mit der Idee] £f6 23...Sg8
24.Lxf8+
Kxf8
25.Tad1
Kg7
26.c4 [Weiß steht etwas besser]
Ehlvest,J (2605)-Beliavsky,A (2655)/Reykjavik/1991/; Solid, but rather passive is 9...0-0
10.Sd2
d6
11.Lh5
Df6
12.f4
S5c6
13.S2b3
(Kasparov's idea 13.Kh1
can be met with 13...Sxd4
14.cxd4
Lxd4!
15.e5
dxe5
16.fxe5
Dxe5
17.Sc4
Dd5
18.Lxd4
Sc6! [Schwarz steht etwas besser]
; 13.Sc4!?
Lxd4
14.cxd4
d5
15.e5
De6
16.Sa3
Ld7
17.Lf3
Sd8
18.Db3
c6
19.Sc2
Dg6
20.Lf2
(20.Ld2!?
) 20...Lg4
21.Lh4
Lxf3
22.Dxf3
Sf5
23.Lxd8
Taxd8
24.Tad1 [Weiß steht etwas besser]
Nabaty,T (2456)-Lerner,K (2542)/ISR-chT/2008/) 13...Lb6
14.Dd2
Dh4
15.Lf3
f5
16.Tae1
fxe4
17.Lxe4
Ld7
18.g3
Dh5
19.Lf3
Lg4
20.Sxc6
Sxc6
21.Dd5+
Dxd5
22.Lxd5+
Kh8
23.Kg2 [Weiß steht etwas besser]
Sveshnikov,E (2580)-Yandemirov,V (2460)/Elista/1995/] 10.f4!?
Being an admirer of Alekhine, positional pawn sacrifices always attracted Kasparov's attention - something which he probably teaches his pupil as well. The text move is more ambitious than other continuations: [Harmless is 10.Sd2
Lh3
11.Lf3
0-0=
(11...h5!?
12.Kh1
Sxf3
13.Dxf3
Lg4
14.Df4
0-0-0
15.Sb5
Le2
16.Lxc5
Lxb5
17.c4
Lc6
18.Ld4
f5
19.f3
h4 [Gegenspiel]
Schiffers,E-Chigorin,M/St Petersburg/1878/) 12.Kh1
Sxf3
13.Dxf3
Lg4
14.Dg3
Ld7
15.Dh4
Tfe8=
/ [Schwarz steht etwas besser] [Läuferpaar] , Motylev,A (2455)-Malaniuk,V (2600)/Swidnica/1998/; The most recent attempt is 10.Kh1
Dxe4
11.Sd2
Dg6
(11...Dh4
12.S2f3
(12.Sb5
0-0
13.Sxc7
Tb8
14.Lxc5
dxc5
15.Sf3
Sxf3
16.Lxf3
Df4
17.Sb5
Le6
18.Dd6
Dxd6
19.Sxd6
b6=
Can,E (2301)-Musakaev,E (2248)/Herceg Novi/2006/) 12...Sxf3
13.Sxf3
Df6
14.Lg5
Df5
15.Ld3
Dd7
16.Te1
f6
17.Le3
Lb6
18.Lc4
(18.Db3!? [Kompensation]
) 18...Kd8
19.Lxb6
axb6
20.Sd4
Dg4
21.f3
Dg5
22.Le6
Sc6
23.Lxc8
Kxc8
24.Se6
Dg6
25.b4
Te8 [Schwarz steht etwas besser]
Zelcic,R (2514)-Georgiev,K (2645)/EU-ch Kusadasi/2006/) 12.Sb5
0-0
13.Sxc7
Tb8
14.Lh5
Df5
15.f4
However, Black has an even better alternative in 15...S5c6!
(4a) 15...Lxe3
16.fxe5
Dxe5
17.Sc4
Dc5
18.Sxe3
Dxc7!?
(18...Dxe3
19.Te1
Dg5
20.Dxd6
Dxh5
21.Txe7
Dg6
22.De5
b6
23.Sd5
Lb7
24.Sf4
Dc6
25.Te1
Tbd8
26.h3
Td7
27.Te8
Td8
28.Te7
Td7
29.Te8
Td8
30.Te7
1/2, Movsesian,S (2670)-Grischuk,A (2715)/ECC Kemer/2007/ 30...Td7=
) 19.Lxf7+
Txf7
20.Txf7
Kxf7
21.Dh5+
g6
22.Dxh7+
Ke8
23.Te1
Le6
24.Sc2
Lf5
25.Sd4
d5!
26.c4
(26.Sxf5!?
gxf5
27.Dxf5 [Kompensation]
) 26...dxc4
27.Sxf5
gxf5
28.Dg8+
Kd7
29.Td1+
Kc6
30.Dxc4+
Kb6
31.Db4+
Ka6
32.Da3+
Kb6
33.Db4+
1/2, Jobava,B (2644)-Movsesian,S (2670)/Pamplona/2007/) 16.Sc4
b5!
17.Lxc5
bxc4
18.Lxd6
Td8
19.Lf3!?
(19.Te1
h6
20.Lf3
Dg6
21.Sd5
1/2, Rublevsky,S (2695)-Khenkin,I (2609)/RUS-chT Dagomys/2008/ (21.Se8
Txb2
22.Dc1
Tc2 [Schwarz steht etwas besser]
) 21...Dxd6
22.Sxe7+
Dxe7!
23.Da4
Dc5
24.Dxc6
Dxc6
25.Lxc6
Txb2 [Schwarz steht etwas besser]
) 19...Tb7
(19...Txb2?
20.Lxe7!
Txd1
21.Tfxd1 [Weiß steht besser]
; 19...Dg6?!
20.Lxe7
Txd1
21.Tfxd1
Lb7
22.Sd5 [Weiß steht etwas besser]
) 20.Lxe7
Txd1
21.Taxd1
Txc7
22.Ld6
Td7
23.Lxc6
Td8
24.Lc5
Txd1
25.Txd1
h5
26.Lxa7
Kh7 [Gegenspiel]
Rublevsky; 10.Lh5
Dxe4
11.Sd2
Dd3
(Black can play even the fighting alternative 11...Dh4!?
12.Sb5
0-0
) 12.Le2
Dg6
13.Lh5=
(13.Sb5
Lh3
14.Lf3
Lxe3
15.fxe3
0-0-0! [mit Initiative]
) ; 10.f3
has been featured most often, but practice has proven Black has little to fear after 10...0-0
11.Sd2
d5!
12.Kh1
dxe4
13.fxe4
(13.Sxe4
Lb6
14.Te1
Lf5
15.Lf4
Lxe4
16.Lxe5
Sc6
17.Sxc6
Lxc6
18.Ld3
Dh5
1/2, Rublevsky,S (2680)-Grischuk,A (2717)/Elista cm/2007/) 13...Lg4
14.Lf4
Lxe2
15.Dxe2
Ld6
16.Tad1
(16.Sb5
S7c6
17.Sxd6
cxd6
18.Lg3
Tfe8
19.Tad1
Tad8
20.c4
Sd7
21.Tf4
Sc5
22.Lh4
Td7
23.Tdf1
Se6
24.Tg4
Dh5
25.h3
Se5 [Schwarz steht etwas besser]
Movsesian,S (2659)-Acs,P (2600)/Budapest/2003/; 16.Lxe5
Lxe5
17.S2f3
Lxd4
18.cxd4
c6
19.Tae1
Tad8
20.Dc4
De6=
Kindermann,S (2505)-Mikhalchishin,A (2530)/Dortmund op/1992/) 16...Tae8
17.Db5
Sg4
18.e5
c6
19.Dxb7
Lxe5
(19...Sxe5
20.S2f3
Sxf3
21.Lxd6
Sh4
22.Lg3
Shf5
23.Tde1
Sxg3+
24.hxg3
c5 [Gegenspiel]
1/2, Chopy (1950)-Komodo1 (1774)/playchess.com/2008/) 20.Lxe5
1/2, Rublevsky,S (2645)-Najer,E (2615)/EU-ch Warsaw/2005/ 20...Sxe5
21.Dxa7
Sg4
22.Tde1
Sf2+!
23.Kg1
(23.Txf2
Sc8 [Schwarz steht etwas besser]
) 23...Sh3+
24.Kh1
Sf2+=
] 10...Dxe4
The only consistent reaction. [10...Sg4
11.Lc1
h5
12.h3 [mit Initiative]
is suspicious.] 11.Lf2
[11.Dd2?
Sg4
12.Lxg4
Lxg4
13.Te1
Dd5
14.Sb5
0-0-0
15.Sxa7+
Kb8
16.Lxc5
Dxc5+
17.Df2
Sd5
18.Dxc5
dxc5
19.Sb5
Sxf4
20.c4
Sd3
21.Te7
c6
22.S5c3
Le6
23.Sa3
Sf4
24.Tf1
Sg6
25.Texf7
Lxf7
26.Txf7
Thg8
27.h3
Td2
28.Se4
Txb2
29.Sxc5
Td8
30.Sd7+
Kc8
31.Sc5
Td1+
32.Kh2
Tdd2
0-1, Chigorin,M-Schiffers,E/St Petersburg/1880/] 11...Lxd4
Again the best. [11...Dxf4?
12.Sb5+-
; ‹11...S5c6?!
12.Ld3
Dd5
13.c4
(13.Te1!? [mit Initiative]
) 13...Dxd4
14.Lxd4
Lxd4+
15.Tf2
0-0
16.Sc3
Ld7
17.Dd2
Lxf2+
18.Dxf2
a6
19.Te1
Tae8
20.h3
f5
21.a3
g6
22.b4 [Weiß steht besser]
Dembo,Y (2427)-Mancini,M (2225)/Cappelle la Grande/2008/; 11...Sd7
12.Ld3
Dd5
13.c4
Dxd4
14.Lxd4
Lxd4+
15.Tf2
Sf6
16.h3
Ld7
17.Sc3
0-0-0
18.Dc2 [Weiß steht etwas besser]
/ [Weiß steht besser] , Steingrimsson,H (2505)-Lukacs,P (2500)/Kecskemet/1991/] 12.cxd4
[12.Lxd4?!
S5c6
13.Sd2
Dg6
doesn't give White sufficient compensation.] 12...S5g6
[‹12...S5c6?!
13.Sc3
Dxf4
(13...Dg6
14.d5
Sb8
15.Lh4 [Weiß steht besser]
[mit Angriff] (15.Lh5!? [Weiß steht besser]
) ) 14.d5
Sb8
(14...Se5
15.Sb5
0-0
16.Sxc7
Tb8
17.Lxa7
Dg5
18.Lxb8
Lh3
19.Tf2
Txb8
20.Dc1+-
Helmond,F (2090)-Nowik,V (2160)/Goch/1993/) 15.Sb5
Sa6
16.Lb6!?
Dg5
17.Lxc7 [mit Initiative]
; Less clear, but still risky is 12...Sd7!?
13.Sc3
(13.Dd2!? [Kompensation]
) 13...Dxf4
14.Sb5
Sd5
15.Lf3
(15.Db3
S7b6
16.Sxc7+!?
Sxc7
17.Le3
Le6
18.Lxf4
Lxb3
19.axb3 [Kompensation]
[Endspiel] [Läuferpaar]) 15...S7f6
16.Te1+
Le6
17.Lg3
Dg5!
(17...Df5
18.Lxd6
c6
19.Db3
Kd8
20.Te5
Dg6
21.Sc3
Sb6
22.Db4
Te8
23.Ta5
Sfd7
24.d5
Lxd5
25.Sxd5
cxd5
26.Lxd5
Sxd5
27.Dxb7
Tc8
28.Dxd5 [Weiß steht besser]
Connor,S-Vetter,G/corr/1993/) 18.Tc1
0-0
19.Sxc7
Sxc7
20.Txc7
Ld5
21.Lxd6
Tfc8!
22.Txb7
Td8
23.Le7
Lxb7
24.Lxb7
Tab8
25.Lxd8
Txd8
26.Te7
Kf8
27.Te2
Df4
28.g3
Dxd4+
29.Dxd4
Txd4
1/2, Merlini,D (2100)-Andresen,T (2330)/corr/1997/] 13.g3!
[This restrained move has replaced the older 13.Sc3
Dxf4
14.Sb5
0-0
15.Sxc7
Tb8
16.d5
(16.Sb5
Sf5
17.Sxa7
Se3!
(17...Ld7
18.g3
Dg5
19.Dc1
Dd8
20.Dd2
Te8
21.Sb5
d5
22.Tfe1
Le6
23.Tac1
Sd6
24.Sxd6
Dxd6
25.Lf1
Ta8 [Gegenspiel]
Gelfand,B (2665)-Beliavsky,A (2655)/Paris rpd/1991/) 18.Lxe3
Dxe3+
19.Kh1
(19.Tf2!?
Sf4
20.Sb5=
) 19...Sf4
20.Lf3
(20.Lc4
Le6
21.Tf3
De4 [Schwarz steht etwas besser]
) 20...Ld7
21.Te1
Df2 [mit Initiative]
[schwacher Punkt] ¤a7,Valade,P (2114)-Nagley,T (1977)/corr/2000/) 16...Dg5
(16...b6!?
17.Sb5
Dg5
18.Sxa7
Lb7
19.Sc6!?
Sxc6
20.dxc6
Lxc6
21.Lg3
Tbe8
22.Lf3 [Kompensation]
[Gegenspiel]) 17.Lxa7
Lh3
18.Tf2
Tbc8
19.Lb6
Sf4!?
20.Dd2
Seg6
21.Lf3
(21.Le3
Txc7
22.Lxf4=
; 21.Lb5!?
) 21...Lf5
22.Kh1
Dh6
23.Tff1
Se5
24.Ld1
g5 [Schwarz steht etwas besser]
Markus,R (2195)-Hernandez Molina,D (2066)/corr/2002/ Black's forces are dangerously active in the vicinity of Whites' ¢.] 13...0-0
Black keeps the §, but allows himself to get pushed back. [The main alternative is 13...Lh3!?
14.Lf3
Df5
15.Te1
d5
16.Db3
0-0
17.Sc3
However, if White wants to fight for an advantage in this line, he must find something against 17...Lg4!N
(17...c6
18.Dxb7
Tfb8
19.Dc7
Df6
1/2, Morozevich,A (2739)-Kramnik,V (2802)/Dortmund/2001/ 20.b3
(20.Sa4
Sf5
21.Tad1
Baroin,B (2052)-Castro,C (1603)/corr/2005/ 21...Tb4!?
22.b3
Sxd4 [unklar]
) 20...Sf5
21.Tad1
Tc8
(21...Tb4?
22.Lxd5
) 22.Da5
Sh6
23.Td2
Sg4
24.Da4
Tc7
25.Tde2
Dd6
26.Da6
Db4
27.Dd3
Sxf2
28.Kxf2 [Weiß steht etwas besser]
Hoefer,H (2057)-Berkley,S (1556)/corr/2002/) 18.Lxd5
Sxd5
1/2, Nakamura,H (2735)-Grischuk,A (2733)/ECC Ohrid/2009/] 14.Sc3
Df5
15.d5 [Kompensation]
[Raum] Contrary to the 13...¥h3?! line, here White has managed to activate his ¥f2. 15...a6
Black must first coordinate his scattered pieces, only then he can try to free himself effectively. Immediate activity can backfire: [15...Td8
16.Lf3
c5
(16...c6
17.Te1
Sxd5
18.Sxd5
cxd5
19.Lxd5
Le6
20.Lxb7
Tab8
21.Le4
Da5
22.Ld4
Se7
23.a3 [Weiß steht besser]
Slugin,S (2439)-Bykov,A (2300)/Voronezh/2009/) 17.Te1
(17.h4! [mit Initiative]
Dembo) 17...Dd7
18.h4
Tb8?!
(18...Sf5
19.h5
Sge7
20.g4
Sh6
21.Lg3 [Kompensation]
) 19.a4
a6
20.h5
Sf8
21.g4
b5
22.axb5
axb5
23.Lh4
Te8
24.f5
Kh8
25.f6 [mit Angriff]
[schwacher Punkt]¢,Dembo,Y (2448)-Stefanova,A (2463)/Solin/2007/] 16.Te1
Kh8N
This is slow and ineffective. [However, White's initiative is dangerous even after the more natural 16...Te8
17.Lf3
(17.Da4
Dd7
only helps Black.) 17...Ld7
18.Tc1
Tac8
19.a4
(19.h4!?
h6
(19...Sf8?!
20.Se4
Kh8
21.Txc7!
Txc7
22.Sxd6
Df6
23.Sxe8
Lxe8
24.d6
Td7
25.dxe7
Txe7
26.Lxb7 [Weiß steht besser]
Engelhard,C-Zielinski,S/corr/2006/) 20.h5
Sxf4!?
21.gxf4
Dxf4
22.Te4
Dg5+
23.Kh1
Sf5
24.Dg1 [Weiß steht etwas besser]
; 19.Db3
b5
20.Da3
(The game indicates Carlsen maybe intended to play 20.Se2!?
[mit der Idee] 20...c5
21.dxc6
Sxc6
22.Sc3 [Kompensation]
) 20...Dh3
21.Lg2
Dh5
22.Da5
Lh3
23.Lh1
Lg4
24.Te3
Tf8
25.Tce1
Sf5
26.Td3
Sh6
(26...Sfh4!? [Kompensation]
) 27.Td2
Tfe8
28.Txe8+
Txe8
29.Dxa6
Ld7 [Gegenspiel]
Koronowski,H (2201)-Glaser,K (2145)/corr/2002/) 19...Kf8
(19...b6!?
) 20.a5
Sg8
21.Txe8+
([besser ist] 21.Db3! [mit Initiative]
) 21...Txe8
22.Se2
Se5
23.Sd4
Sxf3+
24.Dxf3
Dg4
(24...Dg6
25.f5
Dg5
26.Txc7
Lc8 [Weiß steht etwas besser]
) 25.Txc7
Dxf3
26.Sxf3
Lg4
27.Se5! [Weiß steht etwas besser]
Ganguly,S (2634)-Acs,P (2550)/Paks/2009/; 16...Ld7
can transpose into the lines above.; Even 16...Dd7
seems better, than the text-move.] 17.Tc1
Ld7
18.Lf3
Tac8
[18...c6?!
19.dxc6
Lxc6
20.Lg4
Da5
21.Dxd6 [Weiß steht besser]
The [Läuferpaar] is very strong, while Black's ¤ have no outposts.] 19.Db3
b5
20.Se2! [mit Initiative]
Dh3
[Perhaps it was time to lash out with 20...c5!?
21.dxc6
Sxc6
22.Ted1 [Weiß steht etwas besser]
Although Black's 16-th move is less useful than 16...¦e8, his pieces get more chances to breathe, than later in the game.] 21.Sd4
Lg4
22.Lg2
Dh5
23.h4!?
White continues to limit Black's forces. [Carlsen already wants more than 23.Sc6
Sxc6
24.Txc6
Lh3
25.Df3 [Weiß steht etwas besser]
] 23...Sg8?
[23...Ld7
24.Tc3 [Weiß steht besser]
[mit der Idee]¦ec1 [mit Initiative]; [besser ist] 23...Tfe8
24.a4 [mit Initiative]
(24.Da3
Tg8!?
[schwacher Punkt] d5) ] 24.Tc6 [Weiß steht besser]
/+- Now the [schwacher Punkt] [Damenflügel] falls apart. 24...Sf6
25.Txa6
Ld7
26.Sxb5
Tb8
27.a4
Sg4
28.Lf3
Dh6
Sidelines the £. [[besser ist] 28...Df5!?
29.Le4
Dh5
] 29.Dc4
[29.Lxg4
Lxg4
30.Dc3 [Weiß steht besser]
[schwacher Punkt] c7 is possible as well, but White doesn't want to give any chances on the light squares.] 29...Sxh4
Desperation. [
29...Sxf2
30.Kxf2
[mit der Idee] h5+- 30...Sxh4?
31.Th1+-
] 30.Lxg4
Lxg4
31.gxh4
Lf3
32.f5+-
Black's pieces are too passive to create any [Gegenspiel] , the game is decided. 32...Dh5
33.Df4
Lxd5
34.Sxc7
Lb7
35.Tb6
[35.Txd6+-
] 35...f6
36.Ld4
Df7
37.Se6
Tg8
38.Kf2
Tbc8
39.Lc3
Ld5
40.a5
Tc4
41.Sd4
La8
42.Dxd6
Dh5
43.Df4
Tcc8
44.Tbe6
1-0
|